Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Citroen C3 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 94 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.4 seconds | 10.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.2 | 4.4 - 7.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
854 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 85 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`547 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |