Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.2 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.2 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 952 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`457 | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |