Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 69 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 93 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.2 seconds | 9.3 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.2 | 4.5 - 7.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 18 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 55 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`457 | ~ 886 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |