Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Nissan Note 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 110 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.2 seconds | 11.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.2 | 3.6 - 5.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 1495 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 105 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 463 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`457 | ~ 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Nissan Note has
| |