Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.2 seconds | 8 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.2 | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt 2008 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt 2008 is 13 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt 2008 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 760 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`457 | ~ 1`482 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |