Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2016 - 2017
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2013 -
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.3 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 360 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds10.8 seconds
Mitsubishi ASX and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX torque is 40 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.7 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1150 km on highway
770 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi L 200Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.36 m
Width: 1.81 m1.90 m
Height: 1.63 m1.61 m
Mitsubishi ASX and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litresno data
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 131 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0602`350
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 11 60023 600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv