Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2015
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP190 HP
Torque: 300 NMn/a NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.5 seconds
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 40 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.76.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km8.5 l/100km
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
900 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.37 m
Width: 1.77 m1.97 m
Height: 1.63 m1.64 m
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller.
Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres575 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litresno data
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 191 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`060no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 11 40014 800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv