Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2018

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2019 -
Mazda CX-3
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 197 NM207 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds9.7 seconds
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi ASX and Mazda CX-3 have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX torque is 10 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.76.7
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres44 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway720 km on highway
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)
Ground clearance: 190 mm (7.5 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Engine production duration: 18 years12 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mazda CX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.28 m
Width: 1.81 m1.77 m
Height: 1.64 m1.54 m
Mitsubishi ASX is larger.
Mitsubishi ASX is 9 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1206 litres1260 litres
Mitsubishi ASX has 34 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 54 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9701`808
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 15 60017 400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda CX-3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv