Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Hyundai Tucson 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 63 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 111 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi ASX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 14 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | 1756 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 193 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 550 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`065 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 28 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |