Mitsubishi ASX 2017 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 60 HP more power than Renault Captur, but torque is 23 NM less than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 3.8 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.57 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 17 cm longer than the Renault Captur, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi ASX has 71 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`759 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Renault Captur has
| |