Mitsubishi ASX 2017 vs Renault Captur 2018

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2017 - 2019
Renault Captur
2018 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 117 HP150 HP
Torque: 154 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds8.2 seconds
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP less power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Renault Captur. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.15.4
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway1000 km on highway
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 190 mm (7.5 inches)170 mm (6.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years7 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Renault Captur engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.12 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.64 m1.57 m
Mitsubishi ASX is 17 cm longer than the Renault Captur, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres309 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litres1235 litres
Mitsubishi ASX has 75 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 16 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur.
Gross weight (kg): 1`870no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Renault Captur has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12 80011 600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Renault Captur has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv