Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2016 - 2017
Toyota C-HR
2016 -
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 117 HP122 HP
Torque: 154 NM142 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds11 seconds
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 12 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.13.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 330 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway1220 km on highway
880 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota C-HR engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years15 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.36 m
Width: 1.77 m1.80 m
Height: 1.63 m1.56 m
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres377 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litresno data
Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi ASX has 7 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`860
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 11 60021 000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • lower price
Toyota C-HR has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv