Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Seat Ateca 2016

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2016 - 2017
Seat Ateca
2016 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 117 HP150 HP
Torque: 154 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds8.5 seconds
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.15.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km7.3 l/100km
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 120 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway1040 km on highway
880 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km360'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years10 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Seat Ateca engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.34 m
Width: 1.77 m1.81 m
Height: 1.63 m1.60 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litresno data
Seat Ateca has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 126 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`890
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Seat Ateca has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 60021 800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • timing chain engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Seat Ateca has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv