Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Honda HR-V 2015

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2016 - 2017
Honda HR-V
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 117 HP140 HP
Torque: 154 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 secondsn/a seconds
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 23 HP less power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Honda HR-V.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.17.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km7.8 l/100km
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway720 km on highway
880 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 190 mm (7.5 inches)170 mm (6.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.63 m1.61 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX and Honda HR-V are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres431 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litres1456 litres
Honda HR-V has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 47 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 237 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`870no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 11 60017 000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Honda HR-V has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv