Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX and Hyundai Tucson have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX torque is 9 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 9.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 225 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 195 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |