Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Audi Q3 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 23 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 166 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi ASX is 9 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 41 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q3 scores higher in safety tests. The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi Q3, so Mitsubishi ASX quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |