Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 2 HP more power than Opel Mokka, but torque is 1 NM less than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 86 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 153 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`764 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |