Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Seat Ateca 2016

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2016
Seat Ateca
2016 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 117 HP115 HP
Torque: 154 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds11 seconds
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 2 HP more power than Seat Ateca, but torque is 46 NM less than Seat Ateca. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway1080 km on highway
910 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.34 m
Width: 1.77 m1.81 m
Height: 1.62 m1.60 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 442 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litresno data
Seat Ateca has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 68 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`830
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Seat Ateca has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 60022 800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Seat Ateca has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv