Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 23 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Trax engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi ASX has 86 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`884 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |