Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2010 - 2012
Honda CR-V
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mitsubishi ASX is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi ASX also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.02.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 117 - 150 HP140 - 166 HP
Torque: 154 - 300 NM192 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 - 13.1 seconds10.2 - 12.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 8.16.5 - 9.5
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Mitsubishi ASX equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.52 m
Width: 1.77 m1.82 m
Height: 1.62 m1.68 m
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller.
Mitsubishi ASX is 23 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres556 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litres955 litres
Mitsubishi ASX has 137 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 264 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`920~ 2`105
Safety:
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 66005600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Honda CR-V has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv