Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 150 HP | 115 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 300 NM | 164 - 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.1 seconds | 9.4 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.1 | 5.2 - 9.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai ix35. On average, Mitsubishi ASX equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 12 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 172 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 2`044 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |