Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2010 - 2012
Hyundai Tucson
2004 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.02.0 - 2.7

Performance

Power: 117 - 150 HP112 - 175 HP
Torque: 154 - 300 NM184 - 305 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 - 13.1 seconds10.3 - 16.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 8.16.9 - 10.0
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Tucson. On average, Mitsubishi ASX equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.32 m
Width: 1.77 m1.83 m
Height: 1.62 m1.72 m
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller.
Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres644 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litres1856 litres
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 225 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 637 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`920~ 2`171
Safety:
Quality:
high

below average
Average price (€): 66003400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Hyundai Tucson has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv