Mini Countryman 2010 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mini Countryman engine produces 69 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Nissan Juke. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Countryman consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper S | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mini Countryman engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mini Countryman is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
| Mini Countryman has 4 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |