Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Mercedes SLK 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2004 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes SLK 2000 and Mercedes SLK 2004 have the same engine power, but Mercedes SLK 2000 torque is 10 NM less than Mercedes SLK 2004. Mercedes SLK 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.7 | |
|
The Mercedes SLK 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes SLK 2000 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes SLK 2000 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes SLK 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2000 is smaller. Mercedes SLK 2000 is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes SLK 2004, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK 2000 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2004 has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK 2000 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes SLK 2004. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK 2000 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK 2004. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |