Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mercedes SLK and Mercedes CLK have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.5 | |
| Mercedes SLK consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes SLK could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes SLK is 56 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes SLK is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mercedes SLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes CLK has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
| |