Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes SLK engine produces 27 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.4 | |
| Mercedes SLK consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes SLK could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes SLK is 56 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes SLK is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
| |