Mercedes SLK 1996 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 2.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 193 HP | 136 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 280 NM | 190 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | 6.2 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.5 | 9.4 - 12.2 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes SLK is 57 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes SLK is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`548 | ~ 2`031 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
| |