Mercedes SLK 1996 vs Mercedes C class 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes SLK is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 193 HP | 115 - 354 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 280 NM | 185 - 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | 5.2 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.5 | 6.1 - 11.5 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 53 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`548 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |