Mercedes SLK 1996 vs BMW Z3 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 193 HP | 115 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 280 NM | 168 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | 6 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.5 | 7.8 - 10.6 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.29 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes SLK is 4 cm shorter than the BMW Z3, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 165 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Mercedes SLK has 20 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.5 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Mercedes SLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`548 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |