Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Audi TT 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes SLK is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 1.8 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 354 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 450 NM | 210 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 8.5 seconds | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 11.2 | 8.2 - 11.0 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.27 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 3 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK has 75 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.6 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Mercedes SLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`661 | ~ 1`737 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Audi TT has
| |