Mercedes SLK 2004 vs Mercedes SL 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.4 | 3.7 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 360 HP | 245 - 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 510 NM | 350 - 800 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | 4.7 - 7.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 12.0 | 11.5 - 15.1 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SL. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 45 cm shorter than the Mercedes SL, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 317 litres | |
|
Mercedes SL has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK has 27 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes SL. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes SL, which means Mercedes SLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`761 | ~ 2`188 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mercedes SL has
| |