Mercedes SLK 2004 vs Audi TT 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes SLK
2004 - 2008
Audi TT
2006 - 2010
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mercedes SLK is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 5.4 (petrol)1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 163 - 360 HP160 - 340 HP
Torque: 240 - 510 NM250 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.9 - 8.3 seconds4.6 - 7.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.7 - 12.05.3 - 10.3
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.09 m4.19 m
Width: 1.79 m1.84 m
Height: 1.30 m1.35 m
Mercedes SLK is smaller.
Mercedes SLK is 10 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 208 litres290 litres
Audi TT has more luggage space.
Mercedes SLK has 82 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Mercedes SLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`761~ 1`763
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 70008200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SLK has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower price
Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv