Mercedes SLK 2008 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mercedes SLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Volkswagen EOS can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.4 (petrol) | 1.4 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 360 HP | 116 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 510 NM | 155 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.9 seconds | 6.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 12.0 | 6.1 - 9.2 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen EOS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 31 cm shorter than the Volkswagen EOS, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes SLK is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
| Mercedes SLK has 3 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen EOS, which means Mercedes SLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`771 | ~ 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |