Mercedes SLK 2011 vs BMW Z4 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 422 HP | 184 - 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 540 NM | 250 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 7.3 seconds | 4.8 - 7.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.4 | 6.8 - 9.0 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
| Mercedes SLK is 10 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
335 litres | 310 litres | |
|
Mercedes SLK has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes SLK has 45 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. The BMW Z4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes SLK (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW Z4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`846 | ~ 1`767 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |