Mercedes SL 1998 vs Mercedes CLK 1998

 
Mercedes SL
1998 - 2001
Mercedes CLK
1998 - 1999
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Petrol3.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 224 HP224 HP
Torque: 315 NM315 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds8.1 seconds
Mercedes SL and Mercedes CLK have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes SL reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.010.6
Mercedes SL consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes SL could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway810 km on highway
Mercedes SL gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years10 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.57 m
Width: 1.81 m1.72 m
Height: 1.29 m1.38 m
Mercedes SL is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SL is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 265 litres237 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data350 litres
Mercedes SL has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes SL has 28 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. The Mercedes CLK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1302`070
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 16 0003800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SL has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mercedes CLK has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv