Mercedes SL 2012 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes SL engine produces 9 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 10.6 | |
|
The Mercedes SL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes SL consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mercedes SL over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mercedes SL is smaller. Mercedes SL is 22 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SL is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 241 litres | 289 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
381 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Mercedes SL has 48 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SL has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |