Mercedes SL 1998 vs Mercedes CLS 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes SL
1998 - 2001
Mercedes CLS
2004 - 2008
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticAutomatic
Mercedes SL is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mercedes CLS is available only with automatic gearbox.
Engines: 2.8 - 7.3 (petrol)3.0 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 204 - 525 HP224 - 514 HP
Torque: 270 - 750 NM350 - 700 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.8 - 9.8 seconds4.5 - 7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.7 - 15.97.6 - 14.5
Mercedes SL petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLS.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.91 m
Width: 1.81 m1.86 m
Height: 1.29 m1.40 m
Mercedes SL is smaller.
Mercedes SL is 41 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SL is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 265 litres505 litres
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space.
Mercedes SL has 240 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLS, which means Mercedes SL can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`207~ 2`285
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
Average price (€): 16 0006200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SL has
  • both manual and automatic
  • only petrol engines available
  • fewer faults
Mercedes CLS has
  • automatic transmission only
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv