Mercedes SL 2001 vs Mercedes SLK 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.7 - 6.0 | 1.8 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 500 HP | 163 - 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 800 NM | 240 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 7.2 seconds | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 15.1 | 8.7 - 12.0 | |
|
Mercedes SL petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes SL is larger. Mercedes SL is 45 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
317 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes SL has more luggage capacity. Mercedes SL has 27 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK, which means Mercedes SL can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`188 | ~ 1`761 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SL has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |