Mercedes SL 2006 vs Mercedes CLK 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes SL
2006 - 2008
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Mercedes SL is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mercedes CLK has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 3.5 - 6.0 (petrol)1.8 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 272 - 612 HP163 - 481 HP
Torque: 350 - 999 NM240 - 630 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.2 - 6.6 seconds4.7 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.3 - 15.17.5 - 14.4
Mercedes SL petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.54 m4.65 m
Width: 1.82 m1.74 m
Height: 1.30 m1.42 m
Mercedes SL is 11 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SL is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 235 litres390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
339 litresno data
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space.
Mercedes SL has 155 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`247~ 2`182
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 12 8007200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SL has
  • automatic transmission only
  • only petrol engines available
  • fewer faults
Mercedes CLK has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv