Mercedes SL 2012 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes SL is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Camaro has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.5 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 - 585 HP | 315 - 430 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 900 NM | 370 - 556 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.2 - 5.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.9 | 10.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Mercedes SL petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mercedes SL is smaller. Mercedes SL is 22 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SL is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 241 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
381 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Mercedes SL has 79 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Mercedes SL can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`130 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SL has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |