Mercedes ML 1998 vs Land Rover Discovery 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.4 | 2.7 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 347 HP | 190 - 299 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 510 NM | 365 - 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 12.3 seconds | 8.6 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 14.4 | 9.4 - 15.0 | |
|
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Discovery. On average, Mercedes ML equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is smaller. Mercedes ML is 24 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1192 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`008 | ~ 3`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
| |