Mercedes GLK 2012 vs Mercedes GLK 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 | 2.1 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 306 HP | 143 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 620 NM | 300 - 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 10.8 seconds | 6.5 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.1 | 6.9 - 10.6 | |
|
Mercedes GLK 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes GLK 2008. On average, Mercedes GLK 2012 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLK 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes GLK 2012 is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes GLK 2008, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes GLK 2012 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLK 2012 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLK 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`415 | ~ 2`449 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLK has
|
| |