Mercedes GLA 2013 vs Mercedes GLK 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes GLA
2013 - 2017
Mercedes GLK
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mercedes GLA is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes GLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mercedes GLA also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.5 - 2.12.1 - 3.5

Performance

Power: 109 - 360 HP143 - 306 HP
Torque: 250 - 450 NM300 - 540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.8 - 12 seconds6.5 - 10.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 7.56.9 - 10.6
Mercedes GLA petrol engines consumes on average 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes GLK.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.52 m
Width: 1.80 m1.86 m
Height: 1.49 m1.70 m
Mercedes GLA is smaller.
Mercedes GLA is 10 cm shorter than the Mercedes GLK, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes GLA is 21 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1235 litres1550 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes GLA has 31 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLK. The Mercedes GLK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLK (by 315 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.84 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes GLA is 0.34 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLK.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`999~ 2`449
Safety:
Mercedes GLA scores higher in safety tests, but Mercedes GLK is better rated in child safety tests. The Mercedes GLK scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 23 600no data
Pros and Cons: Mercedes GLA has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Mercedes GLK has
  • higher children safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv