Mercedes G class 1993 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002

 
Mercedes G class
1993 - 1996
Toyota Land Cruiser
2002 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.4 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP163 HP
Torque: 305 NM343 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 seconds12.8 seconds
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes G class engine produces 27 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Mercedes G class reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.110.4
Real fuel consumption: 14.3 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes G class consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes G class could require 555 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes G class consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser.
Fuel tank capacity: 96 litres87 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
670 km with real consumption820 km with real consumption
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.85 m
Width: 1.69 m1.88 m
Height: 1.94 m1.90 m
Mercedes G class is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mercedes G class is 22 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 13.3 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 1.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mercedes G class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5002`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 29 6009200
Pros and Cons:
    Toyota Land Cruiser has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv