Mercedes E class 1993 vs Toyota C-HR 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes E class
1993 - 1995
Toyota C-HR
2016 -
Body: SedanCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mercedes E class is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota C-HR can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mercedes E class also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 6.0 (petrol, diesel)1.2 - 2.0 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 75 - 381 HP116 - 152 HP
Torque: 126 - 470 NM142 - 190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 - 20.4 seconds8.2 - 11.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 13.03.9 - 6.9
Mercedes E class petrol engines consumes on average 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota C-HR.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.36 m
Width: 1.75 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.56 m
Mercedes E class is 38 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes E class is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres377 litres
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes E class has 143 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR.
Turning diameter: 12.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`040~ 1`898
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 240019 200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes E klase has
  • also available in 2WD
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Toyota C-HR has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv