Mercedes CLS 2006 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 224 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes CLS engine produces 80 HP less power than Ford Mustang, but torque is 113 NM more than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 13.0 | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLS consumes 5.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 810 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mercedes CLS is 15 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLS has 155 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLS has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |