Mercedes CLS 2008 vs Mercedes CLK 2005

 
Mercedes CLS
2008 - 2009
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 224 HP231 HP
Torque: 540 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 seconds7.4 seconds
Mercedes CLS is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes CLS engine produces 7 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, but torque is 240 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Despite less power, Mercedes CLS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.69.2
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLS consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.92 m4.65 m
Width: 1.87 m1.74 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Mercedes CLS is larger.
Mercedes CLS is 27 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 13 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres435 litres
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes CLS has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLK.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLS is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2802`035
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Mercedes CLK has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes CLS has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 86004800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLS has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mercedes CLK has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv