Mercedes CLS 2014 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLS engine produces 31 HP less power than Volvo V90, but torque is 20 NM more than Volvo V90. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mercedes CLS consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLS could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes CLS consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mercedes CLS engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mercedes CLS is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V90, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 590 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1526 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLS has 30 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes CLS (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLS is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`480 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLS has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |