Mercedes CLS 2010 vs Mercedes CL 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.1 - 5.5 (petrol, diesel) | 5.5 - 6.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 557 HP | 388 - 612 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 720 NM | 530 - 999 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.2 - 7.5 seconds | 4.4 - 5.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 9.9 | 12.1 - 14.9 | |
|
Mercedes CLS petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CL. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mercedes CLS is 12 cm shorter than the Mercedes CL, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes CLS has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CL. The Mercedes CL may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLS is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes CL, which means Mercedes CLS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`321 | ~ 2`557 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLS has
|
Mercedes CL has
| |