Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Mercedes C class 2000

 
Mercedes CLK
1997 - 1999
Mercedes C class
2000 - 2002
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 193 HP163 HP
Torque: 280 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds9.3 seconds
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes CLK engine produces 30 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.89.7
Mercedes CLK consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway880 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.53 m
Width: 1.72 m1.73 m
Height: 1.37 m1.43 m
Mercedes CLK is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`500
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 14001600
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv